Skip to main content

Terrible Candidates: Review

Terrible Candidates: Review

Information:

Mechanics: Party, Debating 
Player Age: 12+ 
Player Count: 3 - 8 Players 
Time to Play: 20 - 40 Minutes 
Game Designer: Sean Dowling, Jack Ford Morgan
Game Artists: Sean Dowling
Publisher: Half-Monster Games
Disclaimer: A review copy for the game was provided by the publisher.

The Game:

Objective:

Are you tired of Trump being president? Do you really think you could do better? Well, now it's time to prove what you’re worth with 'Terrible Candidates'. If you win enough debates you could be the groups' new president and rule the people how you see fit.

Card Anatomy:

The cards are simple and come in two types; topic cards and policy cards.

Topic Cards:

This is the topic that to be debated by the two presidential candidates.


Policy Cards:

This will be played to finish the sentence of the topic card to meet your view and agenda of the topic card.


How to Play:

Let's get this debate underway. Firstly, choose two eager (or unlucky) candidates and deal both players five policy cards. Next, reveal the top card of the topic deck. Each candidate will now choose one policy from their hand to create a sentence combining the topic and their policy card (this will be their agenda that they are debating).

Taking turns, each candidate is given 30 seconds to plead their arguments. If the arguments are, quite frankly, boring or filled with contradictions then the audience (not including the opposition) has a chance to call out these speakers once both debates are presented. You may raise one question to either candidate to poke holes in their argument. However, there can sometimes be a barrage of questions, so a candidate can say the words 'Fake News' to one question, meaning that the question is then ignored. It wasn't worth the time to answer anyway. After hearing both arguments, and presenting questions the public votes for the winner who is then given the topic card as a victory point.

This will continue with new candidates until every player has had a chance to run for presidency twice. The player with the most points is now the newly elected president, surely they must be better than Trump, right?

Final Thoughts:

Pros:
- Great conversation piece
- Fun to get into the spirit of debating and answering questions

Cons:
- People can be stubborn about political views
- Politics isn't a theme that a lot of players are familiar with
- arguments can arise over political views

Terrible Candidates is a great conversation game to play in a party setting. Despite myself and other players not being largely engaged in politics, the debate and question mechanics of the game brought out a fun and engaging environment. My only downside with the game would be the theme, a more engaging theme would have been preferred, such as something from popular culture. With all that said if you are looking for a game that invokes conversation and laughter than 'Terrible Candidates' is worth your time. Just try not to take the politics too seriously.

Click...feed the addiction:

Half-Monster Games
Terrible Candidates on BGG
Expand Your Game Facebook page
Expand Your Game Instagram

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Expand Your Game: Seals

Expand Your Game: Seals Some games that have been reviewed so far really stand out and for those games they deserve an extra highlight. These seals are those extra highlights for a Kickstarter Seal i would highly recommend backing or seeking out the kickstarter post release. For the Silver Seals i would seek out those games if they meet your style of game. The Golden Seals will be pat of my collection for a long time and i would highly recommend adding them to your collection. Go to Golden Games: Marvel United Power Rangers Deck Building Game and Zeo Welcome To.. Gem Hens Everdell: Bellfaire Draftosaurus Eminent Domain Crusader Thy Will Be Done Wingspan: Oceania Sorcerer City Tapestry Everdell: Pearlbrook Cóatl  Air, Land and Sea Wingspan Element Outback War of Supremacy Kings Struggle Can't Stop Express Queenz Kamigami Battle - Battle of the Nine Realms Bushido Bob's Your Uncle Eight Minute Empire Shobu Cryptocurrency Demon Worker Dice...

Power Hungry Pets: Review

Power Hungry Pets:  Review Information: Mechanics:   Player Elimination, Card Game Player Age:  7+  Player Count:  2  - 6 Players Time to Play:  15  Minutes  Game Designer:   Zwierzaki żądne wÅ‚adzy Game Artist:  Seiji Kanai Publisher : Exploding Kittens Year Published:   2024 Disclaimer:  A review copy for the game was provided by the VR Distribution. Introduction: There have been many variations to the classic microgame Love Letter , and Power Hungry Pets is Exploding Kitten's twist on this classic. In the game, you are aiming to win multiple rounds by having the highest-valued card at the end of the game or by eliminating all the other players.  Game Anatomy: Each card will display a value from 0 to 10. This value determines the card’s strength when comparing against opposition. The deck is made up of 21 cards, the lower cards populate more in the deck such as value 1 has five copies, values 2 and 3 have three copi...

Critter Kitchen: Rapid Review

Critter Kitchen: Rapid Review Information: Mechanics:   Worker Placement, Set Collection, Variable, Simultaneous, Programmed Movement Player Age:  10+ Player Count: 1  - 5   Players Game Designer:  Alex Cutler, Peter C. Hayward Game Artist:  Sandara Tang Publisher:  Lucky Duck, Cardboard Alchemy  Time to Play:  20 Minutes  Year Published:  2025 Disclaimer:  A review copy for the game was provided by the VR Distribution.  Rundown: Critter Kitchen is a simultaneous worker placement game played over seven rounds. It will have players gaining ingredients from several locations in preparation for creating three dishes; twice in the game and a final seven-course meal for the critic at the end of the game. Each round you will be sending out three workers; a mouse, a lizard, and a boar. Each of these workers has a speed (order of resolution) and an amount they can carry. This alternates from the mouse resolving first but...