Skip to main content

Terrible Candidates: Review

Terrible Candidates: Review

Information:

Mechanics: Party, Debating 
Player Age: 12+ 
Player Count: 3 - 8 Players 
Time to Play: 20 - 40 Minutes 
Game Designer: Sean Dowling, Jack Ford Morgan
Game Artists: Sean Dowling
Publisher: Half-Monster Games
Disclaimer: A review copy for the game was provided by the publisher.

The Game:

Objective:

Are you tired of Trump being president? Do you really think you could do better? Well, now it's time to prove what you’re worth with 'Terrible Candidates'. If you win enough debates you could be the groups' new president and rule the people how you see fit.

Card Anatomy:

The cards are simple and come in two types; topic cards and policy cards.

Topic Cards:

This is the topic that to be debated by the two presidential candidates.


Policy Cards:

This will be played to finish the sentence of the topic card to meet your view and agenda of the topic card.


How to Play:

Let's get this debate underway. Firstly, choose two eager (or unlucky) candidates and deal both players five policy cards. Next, reveal the top card of the topic deck. Each candidate will now choose one policy from their hand to create a sentence combining the topic and their policy card (this will be their agenda that they are debating).

Taking turns, each candidate is given 30 seconds to plead their arguments. If the arguments are, quite frankly, boring or filled with contradictions then the audience (not including the opposition) has a chance to call out these speakers once both debates are presented. You may raise one question to either candidate to poke holes in their argument. However, there can sometimes be a barrage of questions, so a candidate can say the words 'Fake News' to one question, meaning that the question is then ignored. It wasn't worth the time to answer anyway. After hearing both arguments, and presenting questions the public votes for the winner who is then given the topic card as a victory point.

This will continue with new candidates until every player has had a chance to run for presidency twice. The player with the most points is now the newly elected president, surely they must be better than Trump, right?

Final Thoughts:

Pros:
- Great conversation piece
- Fun to get into the spirit of debating and answering questions

Cons:
- People can be stubborn about political views
- Politics isn't a theme that a lot of players are familiar with
- arguments can arise over political views

Terrible Candidates is a great conversation game to play in a party setting. Despite myself and other players not being largely engaged in politics, the debate and question mechanics of the game brought out a fun and engaging environment. My only downside with the game would be the theme, a more engaging theme would have been preferred, such as something from popular culture. With all that said if you are looking for a game that invokes conversation and laughter than 'Terrible Candidates' is worth your time. Just try not to take the politics too seriously.

Click...feed the addiction:

Half-Monster Games
Terrible Candidates on BGG
Expand Your Game Facebook page
Expand Your Game Instagram

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wyrmspan: Review

Wyrmspan: Review Information: Mechanics:  Engine Builder, Hand Management, Drafting,Set Collection Player Age:  14+  Player Count:  1  - 5 Players Time to Play:  90  Minutes  Game Designer:  Connie Vogelmann,  Elizabeth Hargrave (Designer of original game). Game Artist:  Clémentine Campardou Publisher : Stonemaier Games Year Published:  2019 BGG Weight:  2.66 Disclaimer:  A review copy for the game was provided by the VR Distribution. Introduction: Stonemaier Games is well known for a bird-watching game called Wingspan. Wyrmspan is a spin-off game with a similar essence of engine building but with many changes that creates a different feeling game and allows room in your collection for both. The two most notable changes are the lack of dice and the introduction of a new currency called silver coins which will determine how many turns you have per round. Game Anatomy: Silver Coins: At the start of every round, players ...

Baby Dragon Bedtime: Review

Baby Dragon Bedtime: Review Information: Mechanics:  Deck Building, Real time Player Age:  6+ Player Count:  3 - 8  Players Time to Play:  5   Minutes  Game Designer:   Steve Darlington Game Artist:  Steve Darlington Publisher : Tin Star Games Year Published:  2018 Disclaimer:  A review copy for the game was provided by the publisher. Objective: ‘Baby Dragon Bedtime' is a unique mix of real-time and deck building that includes memory elements.  The mother dragon has demanded her little infants go to sleep but like normal kids, they don't want to go to bed until they absolutely have to. You will be playing as one of these baby dragons trying to get the most loot before ultimately having to go to bed.  Card Anatomy: Each card contains an explanation of what they do and some cards will have a letter of A-G this will help the players to determine their starting deck. Within this game there are three categories of cards; starte...

Critter Kitchen: Rapid Review

Critter Kitchen: Rapid Review Information: Mechanics:   Worker Placement, Set Collection, Variable, Simultaneous, Programmed Movement Player Age:  10+ Player Count: 1  - 5   Players Game Designer:  Alex Cutler, Peter C. Hayward Game Artist:  Sandara Tang Publisher:  Lucky Duck, Cardboard Alchemy  Time to Play:  20 Minutes  Year Published:  2025 Disclaimer:  A review copy for the game was provided by the VR Distribution.  Rundown: Critter Kitchen is a simultaneous worker placement game played over seven rounds. It will have players gaining ingredients from several locations in preparation for creating three dishes; twice in the game and a final seven-course meal for the critic at the end of the game. Each round you will be sending out three workers; a mouse, a lizard, and a boar. Each of these workers has a speed (order of resolution) and an amount they can carry. This alternates from the mouse resolving first but...